On 5-OCT-1994, Naved <surve_n@zebra.cs.jhu.edu> wrote: >Circle 3.0 should definitely NOT have many zones. One of the characteristics >of a finished mud is its library of unique zones. CircleMUD is not intended >to be code run as a mud, it is intended to be a development platform. >The inclusion of many zones would be promoting the use of CircleMUD as a >finished product, which it is not. I do agree that Circle doesn't need to have lots and lots of zones. I think that the zones that are included do need to be examples of good writing and should serve as a sort of spring board for new unique zones. It seems to me that ditching New Sparta, fixing typos/ problems with the old zones, and in general making the zones at least cohesive wouldn't be a bad thing at all. -pfs -- Patrick Suthers | "To boldly split infinitives that never have been split pfs8854@tntech.edu | before..." -- The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST