Pink Floyd writes: > Well, there was one limit on bitfields that I was not aware of that has > helped me decide about changing to bitfields. They can not cross > integer boundaries! That is, I can only have 32 fields in any bitfield > structure. I thought it was unlimited, which would have been the > overwhelming reason to switch to them. I guess I'll stick with bitvectors. > Too bad, though, that could've been an excellent feature of bitfields. Whoa. Bitfields not being able to cross integer boundaries means that you can't have a single bitfield that contains more bits than an int. I don't think that there is any intrinsic limit to the number of bitfields you can have in a structure. \_\_\_ _/ \_\_\_ axis data: specializing in online system setup & design \_ \_ _/ \_ \_ Edward Almasy almasy@axis.com \_\_\_ _/ \_\_\_ President: Axis Data Proprietor: NineJackNine \_ _/ _/ \_ 608-256-5732 (voice) 608-256-5697 (data) \_\_\_ _/_/_/ \_\_\_ 9jack9: on the bleeding edges of culture and technology
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST