On Fri, 5 Apr 1996, Wout Mertens wrote: > > abcdef^gh > > > > is really interpreted as: > > > > a | b | c | d | e | f | (z + g) | h > > > > (z is in the second set of characters). > > weeeell, since z is 26 that's not a good idea :) > Why not just continue: a-zA-Z that gives 52 flags... And THEN you can use ^ > > Just my 2 cents... > > Wout. > I use jg|rt|b etc. which is interpreted as: j & g & (z + r) & (z + t) & (2z + b) etc. an infinite number of flags can be named by this system. Jaco
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST