I don't think this got through the first time...sorry if it did.
On Wed, 24 Apr 1996, Michael K. Lee wrote:
> try loading 3 bags, and hold one of em
Ok, I did what you did, putting 1 bread in the first, 2 in the second,
etc.
> look in 1.bag
> that will show you what is inside the one that you are holding
> (which should not be the case)
It did not do that for me. It showed me what was in 2.bag. To look in
the bag I was holding I simply typed 'look in bag'.
> if you look in 2.bag, it gives you what is inside the 3rd bag.
That it does, and based on what I experienced, it is what I expected.
> if you look 3.bag, it doesn't exist.
Nor should it. Apparently, the look command searches through what you
are holding first. The 1.bag and 2.bag stuff looks through your unequiped
inventory. 0.bag doesn't seem to work. Is that what you mean? I don't
know what it would do if you were wearing a bag, though.
> anyone getting these messages???
> this is the 4th time i sent this,
> and I haven't seen any postings...
Yeah, I got them all, but I figured someone else would be more certain
of what was going on than I.
****************************************************************************
Donald Karpovich * I am myself alone
**************************** Realise I never need to use No-one
dlk2@ra.msstate.edu * Money, Power, Holy Roads,
74547.2546@compuserve.com * Freedom puts my faith in None of the above
**************************** -Duran Duran (1993)
*************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST