On Thu, 25 Jul 1996, Clepto wrote: > then if its so bad why not start another mail-list specifically for code > or for that matter a digest too. Theres nothing wrong with posting an > idea here i guess, but i can see your point with LARGE amounts of > continuos code, although i kind of like it but thats just my NEW school of > thought, anyways thats just me. I don't think Alex was upset at the SIZE of the code and the "waste of bandwidth", its that its making the mud community a identical (yet slightly different). place to be. I can't tell you how many NEW BETA Circle Muds with Oasis OLC there are sitting out there. There is more to being a mud imp than being able to patch. Its just a shame that there are less and less GOOD muds out there, and more and more Circle 3.0 Bpl11's with OasisOLC. Now I cant deny that I've used patches before, and its not a bad thing, but a patches shouldn't be you're whole Mods to circle. And i think a circlemud with standard patches is just as Untouched/Unoriginal as standard Circlemud. Steve quickey@cyberverse.com +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST