For example, some areas of the country (speaking of the US) have ruled in court cases that if you put up a sign that says beware of dog, you have recognized the hazard exists, and if you take no steps to mitigate the hazard and someone is injured, you've basically lost all defenses in the issue. Being an IMP and also a sysop of a BBS, I've seen this topic discussed at length in sysop forums around the world. It is best to contact someone (such as a user group) and see how the local legal issues may effect you. Due to the shrinking of the world though, that may not be a ready protection either since a case for damages can usually be brought either in the location that the damages occurred (the location of the claimant) or the location where the damages originated (the location of the defendant). Plantiff Attorneys are generally very careful to pick the most favorable. Since I deal with this on a day to day basis, thought I'd post my two cents on this one. Tim +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST