I'm not bitching, I'm just saying I think it would be eaiser. Less work. It really doesn't matter to me, I do 99% of my stuff at work, I have lots of spare time. He can relase them whenever. And I'm hardly lazy, I just don't LIKE having to do it. :P If I have to patch in the .rej's by hand, I will. On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Daniel Koepke wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, Michael R. Rudel wrote: > > > Not that, I'm just saying it would be nice and handy. I want him to > > release little STEPS, not big jumps, cause in little fixes it's eaiser to > > port in the new code. In a big jump, the diffs don't always work. > > Then either use a non-beta version (eg., v2.2) or patch in the rejects > by hand. Remember that CircleMUD v3.0 is still beta, despite it being > stable. There's very few bugs in the code for it being a beta version. > No-one is forcing you to use the beta version and asking Jeremy to > release more bug fixes faster is like saying, "I'm too lazy to do the > manual patches, so I want you to find and fix a bunch of bugs, and then > release the fixes for the bugs you find in the little free time you have > for maintaing CircleMUD, so that it's more convenient for me." > > > -- > Daniel Koepke > dkoepke@california.com > Forgive me father, for I am sin. > > > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ > | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | > | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST