We ahve tried both, and found that oasis is extreemly buggy, crash and otherwise, and *I* at least found it hard to debug and track down the problems. On the other hand it was much easier to add new flags and such. The Menu interface is GREAT for new builders.. Obuild, *wow*! Harder to learn because its command you have to remember, but the command line makes it mroe powerful. and you can add more commands to obuild much more easily. Flags are a bit harder to add at first, but I learned ALOT from modifying obuild for all of our differnt olc things. Not to mention Sammy is still around supporting Obuild (and supporting it well, thanksagain sammy) Our coders are 100% for Obuild, our builders all come around _after_ they get used to it. Anyone coming from an oasis background finds it a bit hard to adjust, but once they do, it flies. *end of babble* Ghost Shaidan, ?able Sanity, porsche.ag.net 4000 > patched.src_1.1 and I am now considering putting in on-line creation. > Looking over the ftp site, there seems to be at least two different olc > versions available, obuild and oasis. I was wondering if anyone could > make any reccomendations as to which would be best to use. +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | | Or send 'info circle' to majordomo@cspo.queensu.ca | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST