Well I'm having the worst time with the 128 bitvector patch. I've typed
it through from scratch twice and then checked it 3 times through every
line of the snippet.
The problem I'm having is the call to the macro GET_OBJ_EXTRA in magic.c
magic.c :1008: macro 'GET_OBJ_EXTRA' used with too many (2) args
magic.c :1014: macro 'GET_OBJ_EXTRA' used with too many (2) args
The lines for the code are...
SET_BIT_AR(GET_OBJ_EXTRA(obj, -1), ITEM_BLESS);
SET_BIT_AR(GET_OBJ_EXTRA(obj, -1), ITEM_NODROP);
Now I'm assuming that it's the -1 which is causeing the problem - the
extra argument. It was also one of the things that was changed in the
patch. I checked all the other get_obj_extra changes in the snippet and
couldn't find anything wrong.. I also couldn't locate where anything had
been changed to allow the extra -1 argument.
Anyone got any ideas?
appelae@rainier.chem.plu.edu
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST