>>> > Well, the best I can offer is that you do not test for
>>> > the null condition of temp->next. Thus you are probably
>>> > seg faulting here. Try:
>>> > while (temp && temp->next && (temp->next != obj))
>>> >
>>> > Not sure this is it, but its a good idea to always check
>>> > for the NULL condition anyway.
>>
>>I tried that as well. As soon as I try to access temp->next in ANY form,
>>the crash hits with a seg fault. :(
There was quite a bit of discussion a long time ago
about using <struct>->next in loop conditions.
If I remember correctly, it could all be summarized with:
don't do it.
Do something instead like:
while (temp && next_temp && (next_temp != obj)) {
next_temp = temp->next;
etc.
}
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST