Robert Peters wrote: > > If I'm not mistaken, then the C++ builder is slightly similar > to Borland's Delphi. In theory, that should have everything you > need to compile Circle. But I'd hate to have to do that type of > thing without a command line compiler. You'd have to port Circle > to use Windows messaging, which I seem to remember someone > talking about this with Visual Basic a while back, but I don't think > they had much success. I'd go with Linux and GCC :) > > RP. Yes, you're right. Borland C++ Builder is a native 32 bits windows compiler, and is not slightly similar, is VERY similar to Delphi. I remember another guy in the list that compile (sp? compiled? has compiled? argh...) the mud with BCPPB, but the process is not very easy. And yes, it supports long filenames... :) (I have written an area editor in a few days with it, and is very easy to use) (I'm not speak english, but never get confused about Turbo C++, Borland C++ and Borland C++ Builder... there are three different products... :) ) Thanks for reading my english, -- Leonardo Herrera L. mailto:leherrer@entelchile.net "Me voy a subai, me voy a costai, me voy a tapai y me voy a hacei tuto." -- Ruy +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST