Re: A botched "do_advance"

From: Daniel Koepke (dkoepke@CALIFORNIA.COM)
Date: 11/15/97


On Sun, 16 Nov 1997, Will Andrews wrote:

->>  if (newlevel > GET_LEVEL(ch)) {
->>    send_to_char("Yeah, right.\r\n", ch);
->>    return;
->>  }
->Umm.. I think it should be:
->
->   }
->   if (newlevel < GET_LEVEL(ch)) {
->   ...
->   }
->
->It's logic: if newlevel is greater than GET_LEVEL(ch), then
->what this part of the function does would be illogical.

Uhm, I think the idea is to not let a Greater God advance someone to
Implementor.  If it's lesser than, *then* it's illogical.


daniel koepke / dkoepk@california.com


     +------------------------------------------------------------+
     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
     +------------------------------------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST