On Sun, 16 Nov 1997, Will Andrews wrote: ->> if (newlevel > GET_LEVEL(ch)) { ->> send_to_char("Yeah, right.\r\n", ch); ->> return; ->> } ->Umm.. I think it should be: -> -> } -> if (newlevel < GET_LEVEL(ch)) { -> ... -> } -> ->It's logic: if newlevel is greater than GET_LEVEL(ch), then ->what this part of the function does would be illogical. Uhm, I think the idea is to not let a Greater God advance someone to Implementor. If it's lesser than, *then* it's illogical. daniel koepke / dkoepk@california.com +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST