On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, John Evans wrote:
>When I played around with the patch a while back it seemed to speed
>things up. Less output to to send seemed to mean less drag on the system.
>Maybe it was just me expecting improvements because I added something new
>and so I saw it "run faster". *shrug*
Typically I/O is the slowest part anyway. Especially when you consider the
I/O of the MUD consists of TCP/IP packets over a network connection.
>I would think that that patch would help because it would mean smaller
>buffers and that's less RAM usage. That last sentence was purely in
Possibly, never tested.
>> Just another (off topic, "idiomatic") question... the word is "wierd" o
>> "weird"???
>
>weird, definately weird....
Dictionary says 'weird'.
--
George Greer - Me@Null.net | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST