Re: [IGNORE] Testing 1, 2, 3

From: George (greerga@CIRCLEMUD.ORG)
Date: 12/15/97


On Sun, 14 Dec 1997, Akuma/Chris Baggett/DOOMer wrote:

>George, have you thought of making your Buffer Patch C++ style?
>so instead of doing
>char *arg1 = get_buffer(345);
>you could just do
>Buffer arg1 = new Buffer(345);  (or something like this.)

I'd *love* to make it C++.  Then I could feasibly do the snprintf()
checking on the buffers with custom sprintf/strcpy function.

>I know the buffers could be converted to C++ pretty easily.

Hopefully it is designed that way, I tried..... :)

--
George Greer  -  Me@Null.net   | Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity
http://www.van.ml.org/~greerga | is not thus handicapped. -- Elbert Hubbard


     +------------------------------------------------------------+
     | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ:  |
     | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
     +------------------------------------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST