Whitey wrote:
>
> > Name: SPCC (Society for the Protection against Cruelty to Circlemuds)
> >
>
> Why not call it "The Society of Elitist Coders"?
>
Doesnt sound witty and fun. Besides, It isnt elitist coders, it is
people who dont like the fact that the circlemud name has been disgraced
by the many muds that claim to be original and simply are stock areas
and code.
> > Purpose:
> >
> > To suggest CircleMUDs to players that value originality and to warn
> > players against CircleMUDs that dont.
>
> That sounds like a pretty lame purpose. Originality is very subjective.
> And do you really think you are providing a valuable service by 'warning'
> people about other MUDs? I bet you won't be warning anyone about YOUR
> mud. I bet YOUR mud will be one of the top recommendations.
>
It would be a reccomended mud because it qualifies. Any mud that
qualifies would be added to the list. Any mud that doesnt qualify is
added to the list of bad ones.
> Just let the players decide for themselves. There's no need to put down
> other MUDs. How would you like it if I started a group to warn against
> your mud because I thought it was unoriginal?
>
I would laugh and attempt to get the reasoning why you thought my mud
was unoriginal.
> It's your right to put whatever you want on your web page or wherever.
> But I think it is not in the spirit in which CircleMUD was intended, and I
> also think its a waste of time.
Maybe it isnt in the spirit that Circ was intended, but that is like say
ing circ was designed to be run as stock.
Keep 'em comin!
Fili
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST