>Here's what I got:
>
>struct descriptor_data *dt;
>
> for (dt = descriptor_list; dt; dt = dt->next)
> if(dt)
> if(GET_NAME(dt->character) && !strcmp(GET_NAME(dt->character), newname))
> return FALSE;
>
>Now without the if(dt) it will crash, so I'm guessing it's null. Just urm,
>dont know what to do about it :)
I don't know if this assumption is correct, but it usually works for
everything else. Some compilers (I'm assuming) require a 'dt != NULL'
in there, instead of just 'dt'.
GCC doesn't have this problem as far as I know, but other compilers ya
never know. like some require a break; statement EVEN
after a return; statement in a switch() {}
shrug, wild guess. Don't flame me if I'm wrong, just correct me :-)
Code On
Akuma the Raging Coder
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| "The poets talk about love, but what I talk about is DOOM, |
| because in the end, DOOM is all that counts." - |
| Alex Machine/George Stark/Stephen King, The Dark Half |
| "Nothing is IMPOSSIBLE, Just IMPROBABLE" |
| "Easier Said Than Done, But Better Done Than Said..." |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST