Mark A. Drozd wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> After trying to get a coder for my mud I've come to the conclusion
> that I must learn to code for myself. This is not a bad thing as I
> was planning to do it eventually. I have one little problem I was
> hoping someone can help me out with. While I have the gnu compiler
> on the server I run my mud on, I don't have a compiler on my home
> computer. I had gnu on it, but it takes up way too much space as I
> have a laptop, and had to get rid of it. I was hoping someone knows
> of a smaller compiler that I could use at my home computer to do the
> practice lessons in my books. As it is I have to ftp everything to
> my mud site just to compile it. Plus the mud uses unix and I use
> win95's at home.
I'm not saying this is the best solution...but turbo C++ sounds like the
best all purpose compiler you may wish to use. Its Small, runs in dos,
supports C++, has a decent debugger, and is easily portable. Other than
that, i've not seen very many compilers smaller than gnu, hell, my MSVC
compiler takes up 200+ meg (96 megs being 1 help file....figure that out
)
If this is what you may want to use...i have the old shareware version
of it laying around here somewhere, the restriction of it is that you
can't compile a proggy into an .exe that is standalone....but it's great
for learning code.
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST