Eric Green wrote:
> I have just started discussing with another DG imp about starting a
> bazaar style CircleMUD project. The primary goal i was interested in
> was coverting it to C++ (much more object oriented than DG was). After
> that, adding core features expected of current MUDs (OLC, events, etc)
> and improving the flexibility.
>
> For those unfamiliar with the bazaar development style, it is fairly
> open development. A few developers accepting changes from a the
> community of users, with frequent snapshots of the code (or direct
> read-only access) between the stable releases. See
> http://sagan.earthspace.net/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/ for details.
>
> We haven't decided on anything yet, but there is some interest there.
I'm familiar with exactly the paper you're referring to bud. :) I
agree. I think there are tons of features to be implemented and not
enough coders to do them if every one of us keeps re-inventing the
wheel. Count me in - because once I get the base features set up in my
DG-based MUD, I want to flesh out that spell simming! :)
Now there's a project that just DEMANDS bazaar treatment.
Daniel AKA Garadon
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST