On Sun, 29 Mar 1998, Christian Loth wrote:
->Use either d->str or (*d).str but I think *d->str doesn't look right.
There is a lesson to be learned here. Never assume that a variable is
cast in a particular way. FYI, "d->str"--directly from structs.h--is
cast as, "char **d->str". Which means, "*d->str" is the correct way
to access a string of characters in d->str (I assume a line), and
then, that "**d->str" can be used to access single characters of one
line in d->str. :)
->> O... um... sorry for spammin te list... but... tey ARE ( and )s :) I was typin
->> it from a minimized dos window so tey LOOKED like < and >s ;) Um.. ok, Here is
->> te real code:
->>
->> and te next:
->>
->> Ok, TATS te rit way... stupid keyboard... just look at it for awile and youll
->> et it :)
Get a new keyboard. A spill-proof one, at that.
-dak
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST