Thus spake "Phillip A. Ames" <kirk47@JUNO.COM>
> Although my MUD is not up, I feel that two coders(the implementor of a
> MUD and also someone he/she trusts well enough with their code) will be
> able to do a good job. I only say this because that way, if the coder is
> supplied with their own copy of the source code, any changes they make
> can simply be e-mailed to the implementor, for them to put in the "real"
> MUD code, and, upon fixing any bugs with it, send the coder the updated
> version. This allows the implementor to keep track of what's going into
> the MUD, while also lessening the burden on them. Just my two cents,
>
Or if you have two ports, make a test mud copy, and only let your
other coder into the other directory with the testmud. He or she
gets to change whatever's there to his or her own liking, ... etc,
but he can't delete it and run his own, or whatever.
.-------------------------------------------------------------.
| The Fractal Dimension -- "Nonexistent mud of the year"|
'-------------------------------------------------------------'
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST