On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 shirak@canada.com wrote: >My testing at home when I first did it seemed much closer than the results I >got with that download. Hmm..., perhaps GNU C and MS VC++ do math differently... I surely hope not. :) >1) Since you hard-coded top-level in there anyways, you can take out all the >top level calculations, and hard-code it to be 30, imms don't need saving throws. Right, that's why I threw out the level stuff. >2) Change the formula to this: > >return (int)((-(high_val - low_val) / ((float)(top_level-1))) * (level - 1) >+ high_val); > >Perhaps a bit more tweaking, and I can get it perfect. > >(to save you the test, results with this are 860 total, and 353 wc thing) > >Also..., if that function would round to nearest int instead of just dropping >the decimal (I have no help files, and can't remember function name), most of >the results of -1 (probably 100 or so) would be perfect. Rounding (to tens) goes like: (result + 5) / 10 Rounding to 1: (result + .5) (Since .5 + .5 = 1 and >.5 + .5 = 1+ and <.5 + .5 < 1) Not sure what your function would be, I'll leave it up to you to figure out. :) -- George Greer, greerga@circlemud.org | Genius may have its limitations, but http://mouse.van.ml.org/ (mostly) | stupidity is not thus handicapped. http://www.van.ml.org/CircleMUD/ | -- Elbert Hubbard +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+ +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST