Today, Tony Maro spake to the list: > Daniel, are you saying that you don't believe higher level characters > need higher level equipment? No, I'm saying not *every* higher level character should get higher level equipment. The way you rephrased it makes it sound like I meant NO higher level characters get higher level equipment, or that I'm positing that higher level characters don't need better equipment to be at their best. I said neither of those things. > Would a Samurai master use a $100 sword bough from a mail order > catalog? #ifdef PEDANTIC First, "samurai" is the incorrect term. A samurai was something akin to a knight in feudal Japan. It was not a "do" (a way) or martial art. There were, of course, many different arts for the sword - some of which aren't known now or go by different names. The most proper term these days would probably be "kendo" (Way of the Sword), although since that's an Olympic event now (they don't play with live blades, sadly :) it's hard to even go with that. Other sword arts that come to mind are mainly about drawing, killing, flicking off the blood, and returning the blade to the scabbard in one motion... #endif > Would it be as sharp? Yes. Don't think for a second that just because it's a shinken ("new blade") that it's not sharp. I have a friend who had to get a finger reattached for being so stupid. For the record, sword quality is rarely about the sharpness of the edge. A toothpick can be sharp, but that doesn't mean I'm going to go into a fight with one. Sword quality can be split into three categories: I. Craftsmanship II. Strength (Hardness, Weight, and Flexibility) III. Balance Note the second. A sword cannot just be hard. If that's the case, I could make a 30lb. sword and be considered a master swordsmith. Not so. It's too heavy. So it needs to be of a reasonable weight so that it can be fast. We can't however, sacrifice too much material because then it's weak. Finally, we need flexibility. The hardest blade in the world will snap if hit hard enough. The key is to make a pliable center to the sword, to allow it to give a little so it doesn't break right off. As far as I can remember, the outter shell of the sword was/is made hard by continuously folding the hot iron and then cooling it in whatever sort of water was conducive to hardness (I can't recall if it's salt water, water, or an oil? I'm not a blacksmith). A very good sword would have steal that had been folded hundreds of times. > Of course he would want the strongest steel and the sharpest blade. Then he should try to get it from the guy who has it. And if some people want it from him after he's taken it, then they can come and try to take it. But there's not going to be fifty swords with the "strongest steel and the sharpest blade." If you don't have one of the good ones, then you can either try to get it (steal it, kill for it, try to buy it off of some idiot who doesn't know what he has) or make due with the weapon you have. In combat, your weapon isn't the whole equation. It's your skill with whatever you're wielding that matters the most. The guy with the best sword in the game might have been good enough to get it, but who says that he'll remain the best player in the game? Or that he won't make a stupid mistake and get a quivver of arrows planted in his back? Or have it stolen from him while he sleeps? -dak +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST