Shane Lee wrote: > However, I specifically said that the code I was using was a mockup of > my problem area, not the actual code. When you post a mockup, expect to have the mockup criticized, if you want to find the problem in your actual code, then post the actual code. > You also said that I would want to pass "a", but I also wrote that I > would be deleting the file as soon as it was wrote to. I use a perl script > for this. Thus, I have to 'touch' the file before I write to it every > time. So "wb" should work fine. My understanding is you're writing a text buffer, so why are you opening a binary file? In most Unix's the "b" is ambiguous, it does the exact same thing with ot without it, but for the sake of portability, it is a good idea to use it only when writing a binary file. Also, you need not delete and touch a new file, fopen will create the new file if it does not exist, and will also truncate it (or delete the contents) if it does exist. > Next, the idea of using SUB_CMD's hadn't occured to me, since this is > all happening in the nanny() proc (hence the reference to SEND_TO_Q). > I'm not too sure, but I do believe that a SUB_CMD would be wasted > there. Hrmmm, I have no idea where anyone got the idea that you were doing from nanny, all I see in your original post is that you want code to dump a text buffer (a character array) to a file. Anyways, here is my answer to what I percieve to be your original question... void dump_to_file(const char *filename, const char *buffer) { FILE *fp; if (!(fp = fopen(filename, "w"))) return; fputs(buffer, fp); fclose(fp); } There it is, doesn't get much simpler or straightforward than that. Regards, Peter +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 04/11/01 PDT