George Greer wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Peter Ajamian wrote: > > >George Greer wrote: > >> > >> The problem isn't the availability of a secondary server. The actual DNS > >> file has: > >> > >> NS cambot.circlemud.org. > >> NS dns.m-l.org. > >> > >Should've been able to get at least that when I did a ls -d in nslookup, > >that timed out as well. > > Except network connectivity to the machine was dead so you can't access it. > > 10:34am up 110 days, 14:26, 5 users, load average: 0.06, 0.02, 0.00 > Odd, though, that both nslookup and dig (in the part you snipped) indicated that the server was found, they just timed out trying to get an answer from it. > If you query Cambot itself, you'll get the proper response. It appears > nameservers will query Cambot for nameservers after the original > (root|gtld)-server query times out. Well, they only know to query other nameservers if they can get the ns entry off of cambot, of course if cambot is working to return the ns query, then they really don't need the other nameservers. Kinda a catch 22. Of course caching can play into the equation to make this partially usefull, but it is no substitute for having the correct ns entries in the root servers. > I _do_ get requests for circlemud.net > at dns.m-l.org. > The only way I could possibly explain that is that servers which have the ns entry cached from when it was prior working needed an A or CNAME query. Getting the NS entry from thier cache they were able to find the secondary, not very reliable, though. > In fact, this gtld-server has the right entry: > > dig @l.gtld-servers.net. circlemud.net. ns > $dig @l.gtld-servers.net. circlemud.net. ns ; <<>> DiG 8.2 <<>> @l.gtld-servers.net. circlemud.net. ns ; Bad server: l.gtld-servers.net. -- using default server and timer opts It comes up as bad server. Sure you didn't get the same message and simply missed it (thereby getting the entry from localhost which was probably set as default)? Have you been getting a lot of problems from Network Solutions? I've been changing my domains over from them to other registrars who are less than half the cost and appear to give me better support. Last time I tried to reach Network Solutions by phone I eventually gave up and thier web interface never seems to work right. I guess they figure that thier name gives them the right to overcharge for crappy service, oh well, you can always switch. Regards, Peter -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/03/01 PST