On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Peter Ajamian wrote: >(!buf || !buf2) will always return false since they are both statically >allocated and will never be a NULL pointer, I think you mean... > >(!*buf || !*buf2) > >Which will do what you want. Yep, that's what I meant. I just copied his code without thinking because I was in a hurry as the lab was closing on me. And yes, since the function seems to require two arguments always, the 'buf' check is redundant. -- George Greer greerga@circlemud.org -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/03/01 PST