> that Shane was simply a bit confused in that area. Anyways, the problem > is that the html server he's using uses name-based virtual aliases which > is not supported under HTML 1.0[1]. Note that I have not verified that Wouldn't that be HTTP 1.0, _not_ HTML 1.0 ? HTML 1.0, which is just a markup language for writing documents in, anything related to retrieving them, sending them, etc occurs through the HTTP protocol which is really something different -- A HTML embedded link simply tells the client 'where to go for a document', it doesn't tell them how to get there or how to ask for the document (network connection, local file, dns lookups, etc) -- it has to rely on a mechanism that supports the HTTP protocol.. Name-based virtual domains are definitely supported under HTTP / 1.1; I don't know about HTTP/1.0 -Mysid -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST