Re: Bit Flags

From: Peter Ajamian (peter@pajamian.dhs.org)
Date: 06/05/01

Next message: Mike Breuer: "Re: Bit Flags"
Previous message: Mike Breuer: "Re: Bit Flags"
Maybe in reply to: Patrick M. O'Laughlin: "Bit Flags"
Next in thread: Mike Breuer: "Re: Bit Flags"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mike Breuer wrote:
>
> 1 is assumed by the compiler to be an integer, and then left shifted 32
> positions which should result in 0 on a 32-bit platform.  To get around this,
> I created a macro:

You don't need a macro, (1ULL << 32) works fine.

Regards, Peter

--
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+
   | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
   | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html |
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+

Next message: Mike Breuer: "Re: Bit Flags"
Previous message: Mike Breuer: "Re: Bit Flags"
Maybe in reply to: Patrick M. O'Laughlin: "Bit Flags"
Next in thread: Mike Breuer: "Re: Bit Flags"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST