"Daniel A. Koepke" wrote: > > That's not a disagreement. My message was not simply a flame. So let me get this straight. You're saying it's okay to flame as long as you have something else in the post that's usefull? Regards, Peter -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST