Re: META: Public flames

From: Peter Ajamian (peter@pajamian.dhs.org)
Date: 06/20/01


"Daniel A. Koepke" wrote:
>
> That's not a disagreement.  My message was not simply a flame.

So let me get this straight.  You're saying it's okay to flame as long as
you have something else in the post that's usefull?

Regards, Peter

--
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+
   | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
   | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html |
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST