Ok, i realize one line responses aren't exactly the most helpful,
but here's an idea that I think might solve the problem.
>sscanf(line,"%d %d %d %d %d %d %d %ld",t, t+1, t+2, t+3, t+4, t+5, &boogle,
>&tester);
You must include a SPACE in the format being scanned like so
sscanf(line," %d %d %d %d %d %d %d %ld",t, t+1, t+2, t+3, t+4, t+5,
&boogle, &tester);
It's has to do with sscanf()'s weird functioning (are they ever going
to fix it? That's always a good question i guess (but why does it need
to be fixed? Eh? Anyone? If that doesn't help, let me/us know.
I think that should help though.
Don't forget to change BOTH sscanf()'s to look the same.
Akuma the Raging Coder
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
| Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST