>> If I have a container with say a 250 weight and I wear it, my carried >> weight goes to 0 or to whatever else I'm holding. This to me, seems >> like it should be a bug. > Perhaps a bug, perhaps not. If you think of the weight as serving the dual > purpose of describing how much an object weighs and what its encumbrance is > when carried, it might make more sense. I can carry a lot less stuff if I > also have to carry my clothing in my arms, but the clothing hardly slows me > down if I'm wearing it. The same goes for carrying a backpack. I was thinking of a total encumbrance type of weight. The items worn work towards the total encumbrance by only 1/2 and items in hand would be full encumbrance. 50lbs on your back/body is a lot different from carrying 50lbs around with ya. Any ideas on implementation? Rob------------------- -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/05/01 PST