Re: Poll: global buffers

From: Mike Stilson (mike@c746148-a.ehlls1.pa.home.com)
Date: 07/20/01


On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:56:03PM -0700, George Greer came up with this idea:
> Who thinks the global buffers (buf, buf1, buf2, arg) need to go?
> Who wants to keep them?
> and why?

Off with their heads. (ok, their pointers, references, and addresses)

Ok, actually I don't mind them, but I already went through and renamed all of
mine, as I always use names like that for quick-n-dirty local buffers.

(I only had 1,664 lines of warnings from -Wshadow to wade through)

Only reason to keep: inertia

-mike

--
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+
   | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
   | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html |
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/06/01 PST