On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:44:09AM -0800, George Greer wrote: > I finally weeded out all of the "-1 = not-exist" cases for rooms, mobiles, > and objects by realizing that if I changed "room_vnum" and friends to > unsigned variables the compiler would helpfully point out all the cases for > me. So now I'm left considering whether or not to keep them unsigned. > > Argument for signed variables: > * Custom code assuming "-1" still works. What about custom code that uses int instead of room_vnum or sh_int instead of room_rnum and assumes -1 still works for invalid vnums/rnums? -Mysid -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/24/03 PDT