On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, krenshala wrote: >Has anyone (aside from me :) considered coding an IS_CLASS(ch,<CLASS>) >function that can replace the IS_<CLASS>(ch) functions? Why not use GET_CLASS(ch) == CLASS_xxx ? I'm not sure what IS_CLERIC buys other than !IS_NPC() checks (which are bogus anyway if you give mobiles classes), but it's there. -- George Greer greerga@circlemud.org -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | | Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/24/03 PDT