On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:36:19AM +0000, Bobby Solis wrote:
>The below is taken out of act.comm.c where 2 errors and 2 warnings were
>found:
>
> act("You can't write on $p.", FALSE, ch, paper, 0, TO_CHAR);
>E1 char *backstr = NULL;
>
> if (paper->action_description) {
>E2&W1 backstr = str_dup(paper->action_description);
> send_to_char("There's something written on it already:\r\n", ch);
> send_editor_help(ch->desc);
>W2 string_write(ch->desc, &paper->action_description, MAX_NOTE_LENGTH, 0,
>backstr);
>
>Error 1 (E1): syntax error : missing ';' before 'type'
It doesn't like you putting the definition there. Move to top of the
function with the rest of the declararations.
>Error 2 (E2): 'backstr' : undeclared identifier
Because of E1.
>Warning 1 (W1): '=' : 'int ' differs in levels of indirection from 'char *'
Because of E1.
>Warning 2 (W2): 'string_write' : pointer mismatch for actual parameter 5
Because of E1.
>After all this I'm pondering if OLC is worth it?
Yup.
--
Under the DMCA, I'm allowed to use my computer and the internet to
design, discuss, and improve a thermonuclear weapon, but I can't
use it to watch a DVD while running Linux.
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
| Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html |
| Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/25/03 PDT