On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, George Greer wrote: > On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Daniel A. Koepke wrote: > > >I'm reconsidering changing special procedures to differentiate > >between mob and violence pulse calls. The problem is that much of > >the existing spec-procs rely upon ch being the mobile when there is > >no command. > > That could be considered a bug since you should assume 'me' is > yourself, but not 'ch'. Oh, yes, I consider it a bug as much as I consider the shared semantics of violence and mobile pulse spec invocations a bug -- if not more of one. Unfortunately, it's a design bug and considerable non-stock code has been written that relies on the current, if flawed, design. That's what I'm concerned about. > Not that it helps anything other than what you call that changes that > have to be done. ...<blink>... That's it: no more Babelfish for you. -dak -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | | Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/25/03 PDT