>From: Edward J Glamkowski <eglamkowski@ANGELFIRE.COM> >Subject: [CIRCLE] poll >Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:02:55 -0400 > >Which method do you use for breaking the 32 flag bitvector limit? > >1) I don't >2) 128-bit patch >3) bitfields >4) AFF2_ bitvector (and AFF_3, etc.) >5) something else > > >Basically, I ask because I did the bitfields.3bpl17.src thing on the >ftp site and wonder if it would be worthwhile to do more stuff with >it (like update to bpl20 (trivial) and integrate it with OLC or >DG events or the like (not so trivial)). If nobody is using it >I won't bother, but otherwise I might. > >I do suspect, however, it doesn't get much use cause it doesn't have >integration with Oasis and DG whereas other systems do, or are at >least easier to integrate. I used the 128-bit patch.. or rather, a portion of it. I only added for whatever I actually needed more flag space for. I only made it 64-bit seeing that I don't think I'll ever need 128. It's not all that hard to convert anyway. _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | | Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/25/03 PDT