> displaying them properly. Either double the %-signs that shouldn't be > interpreted or make sure they're not part of the format string but in one > of the %s-declared buffers. Ok, so while poking around looking at various send_to_char calls, I notice that there are instances in stock code which do not follow the: send_to_char(d, "%s", buf); convention. Should they all be changed, or is there a reason why some of them are merely: send_to_char(d, buf); . . . ? What you're saying makes some sense as certain characters don't translate well when doing a simple printf(); . . . like the \ character for example. (Sorry for my total newbie comment here, but it helps me to understand when I put it in really basic terms.) Ok, well, there's my question for the moment. Time to go watch one more hour of TV, then back to the grindstone. :) -Mathew -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | | Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/25/03 PDT