On Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:27:03 -0800, Chris Ward <wwc@cyg.net> wrote: >I wanted to jump in here on the topic of "Complete" codebases and get some >peoples opinions on such beasties. How many people would love to be able to >download a fully modded Circlemud with all the bells and whistles ?, don't >most of us want to have all those nice fancy toys on our mud for our users >to enjoy and play with ? or am I completely wrong here and everyone likes >having few features and having to wonder how to add all those cool things u >see on other muds to your stock mudbase? I personally would rather see some of these individual patches updated. Once I become more familiar with circle and C programming in general I will probably try my hand at doing it myself. Like a few have said earlier, it can become a headache trying to remove features you don't want. Its much easier to add than take things out. Believe me, there are _plenty_ of patches out there that need to be updated. I think some of the ones you mentioned putting into the "complete" codebase have yet to be updated. Thats just my opinion though. A "complete" codebase would be cool too. -Jordan Naas -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | | Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/26/03 PDT