On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, David Hamilton wrote: > It appears that all would be solved if the \x1b[6n response could be > automatically inserted into char comm; we would be set. I don't know if > the move from SEND_TO_Q had anything to do with this or not. The issue is that telnet is a line-oriented protocol. There is exactly one way to solve that "problem": negotiate the client into "char-by-char" mode. That is, there are exactly zero good ways to solve this "problem" for your uses. If you bothered to properly negotiate into "char-by-char" mode, then you may as well negotiate on TERMTYPE and forget the \x1B[6n hack. This has been discussed several times before. For more information, check the archives or the relevant TELNET RFCs. -dak -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | FAQ: http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | | Archives: http://post.queensu.ca/listserv/wwwarch/circle.html | | Newbie List: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/circle-newbies/ | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 06/26/03 PDT