> > Changing GET_COND(ch, FULL) = -1 to GET_COND(ch, FULL) <= -1 > > isn't a suggested method. > ^^ not meant to be an assignment in > this case, but rather a simple equals... sorry if this caused even more > confusion ;) damnit, I'd hate to make us all feel like a bunch of freakish compilers :) picking so hungrily at such a 'minor' thing as = instead of ==. Next thing we know every person on this list will be walkng down the street and we'll all keel over and die screaming "Segmentation Fault. Core dumping!" Greg 8^)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST