You have to be running more then small C programs on 64mb's..? Even Windows is not that power hungry. I've been compiling and testing Circle under a 486dx2/66 with 8 megs of ram (I'll be the first to tell you, I'm gonna be relieved when my new comp is done). I can't tell you how well '95 handles the load, I have a poor INET connection. Later, Bloodwych On Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:08:52 -0500 Linebacker <linebacker@microlink.net> writes: >I am just curious, how effecient does circle run under 95? Does >anyone have a mud up running win95 with a significant player >load? I wuld like to check it out. > >I just think windows is the last thing I would run a mud on. Hell >it eats up my 64megs ram just running simple C programs and other >stuff. > >If anyone cuold give me an address, I would appreciate it. >Thanks, >Chuck > >+-----------------------------------------------------------+ >| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | >| http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | >+-----------------------------------------------------------+ > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST