derivative? It uses the same security code. If your talking about a user on one of your own computers, yes, then I agree. There are ways to secure a Windows95 computer tho. Later, Bloodwych On Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:40:32 -0400 Lost Empire <Gkelly1@ix.netcom.com> writes: >I was running a win95 mud privatly, just for testing. If anyone out >there is running a win95 mud, you are asking for trouble. Windows 95 >is >INCREDIBLY easy to hack, and if anyone who has a brain finds out your >mud is win95, your in trouble.. > > > GK > >Katzlberger Thomas wrote: >> >> You wrote: >> >> snip >> >> > circle compiles fine under windows 95 with MSVC++ ver 4.0 >> > you just have to follow the INSTRUCTIONS that come with the >> > distribution. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> > they are in the form of readme files >> > doesn't anyone look at all the info available before asking for >> > help?? >> > >> > John >> >> Well I don't run it under Win95, hence I don't have to read the >file. >> >> I was asked for a suggestion and that was my very subjective >response. >> >> BTW: I am curious how many of the readers of this list run a >> public accessible MUD on Win95 or WinNT (NOT with MODEM) ? >> >+-----------------------------------------------------------+ >| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | >| http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | >+-----------------------------------------------------------+ > +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/07/00 PST