On Thu, 31 Oct 1996, Jeremy Elson wrote: > > administrator want non-saving aliases? Isn't one of the first things > > everybody does is put in the saved alias patch? No, I wrote my own because I didn't like the way Circle did aliases/didn't save them, but I did not put in the patch. > The whole point of the CircleMUD project was to include features that > *everyone* agrees are standard, so that imps can spend their time coding > something new. If there are completely de-factor standard "stock" things > that everyone agrees should be in Circle, then I'll probably add them -- > as long as they do not violate the "stockness" of the base. I thought the idea was to make a "blank slate" mud, for Imps to put their own stuff in, while not having to worry about bugs in the current code. I don't see much else that should be tweaked about circle (except for the etext system, which is planned for bpl12?) OLCs cant be standard, unless you put in #defines to have any of the many types (menu based, command based, none at all, etc) I think the new improved editor patch, should be looked at (evaluated, text editing can break a lot of things, and introduce a lot of memory problems) and possibly added, but definatly stay away from the creative aspects of code adding (races, more classes, spells, skills, etc) -- Steve Moret smoret@ea.oac.uci.edu quickey@cyberverse.com +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://cspo.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list_faq.html | +-----------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/18/00 PST