>>Wouldn't work, as one_argument takes all of two parameters.
>
>Ok so I missed my parenthesis :P
>
>return one_argument(one_argument(one_argument(argument, arg1), arg2), arg3);
>
why not this one,
return one_argument(two_arguments(argument, arg1, arg2), arg3);
which would also leave it open for something such as
four_arguments:
return one_argument(three_arguments(argument, arg1, arg2, arg3), arg4);
five_arguments:
return one_argument(four_arguments(argument, arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4), arg5);
etc, etc, you get the picture, eh? :-P
if i'm wrong in this, please correct me, but i believe this would
cut down on all the extra typing :-P
have fun :-) I know I'll be using these (better than a lot of half_chops() )
(at least up to four_arguments, five_args is a bit much, but WHO KNOWS? :-P)
Akuma the Raging Coder
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| "The poets talk about love, but what I talk about is DOOM, |
| because in the end, DOOM is all that counts." - |
| Alex Machine/George Stark/Stephen King, The Dark Half |
| "Nothing is IMPOSSIBLE, Just IMPROBABLE" |
| "Easier Said Than Done, But Better Done Than Said..." |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST