On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Sean Butler wrote: > > Well, the best I can offer is that you do not test for > > the null condition of temp->next. Thus you are probably > > seg faulting here. Try: > > while (temp && temp->next && (temp->next != obj)) > > > > Not sure this is it, but its a good idea to always check > > for the NULL condition anyway. I tried that as well. As soon as I try to access temp->next in ANY form, the crash hits with a seg fault. :( John Evans <evansj@hi-line.net> May the source be with you. +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST