On 12/5/97 3:01 PM, Angus Mezick (angus@EDGIL.CCMAIL.COMPUSERVE.COM)
stated:
>
> 2) if it is, is this line wrong or am I confused:
> if (!ob->carried_by && !ob->in_obj && !ob->worn_by &
> !ob->contains
> && (world[ob->in_room].zone == zone)
> && (!IS_SET(world[ob->in_room].room_flags, ROOM_HOUSE)))
> extract_object(ob);
>
> notice the single & symbol after worn_by. that just seem wrong.
Also could be shortened to:
if ((ob->in_room != NOWHERE) && (world[ob->in_room].zone == zone) &&
!IS_SET(ROOM_FLAGGED(ob->in_room, ROOM_HOUSE)))
extract_object(ob);
The reason? ob->in_room SHOULD NOT BE NOWHERE if all the other checks
pass... 'sides that it also works just in case all the other checks pass
and ob->in_room is still NOWHERE for some odd reason (obj_from_room /etc
without following obj_to call)
- Chris Jacobson
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/08/00 PST