At the very end of this function, is there any reason not to do a ch=NULL; right have the free(ch); call? I think this might be a nice way to ensure consistancy. But for that DT and fast aggr problem, you need to check to see if(ch && ch->in_room) if !ch, then ch->in_room won't be checked. --Angus +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST