> >At the very end of this function, is there any reason not to do a ch=NULL;
> >right have the free(ch); call? I think this might be a nice way to ensure
> >consistancy. But for that DT and fast aggr problem, you need to check to
> >see if(ch && ch->in_room)
since everyone explained why it wouldn't work, but didn't provide a
solution, here's one..just make a macro like:
#define FREE(var) do { \
free(var); \
var = NULL; \
} while (0)
and replace all free() calls with FREE()..
siv
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://democracy.queensu.ca/~fletcher/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST