George wrote: > > > It wouldn't take a lot of convincing to make the next version of CircleMUD > in C++. Or at least that is how Jeremy felt last time the issue came up. > Then the issue becomes whether it is better to start from scratch rather > than try to convert the existing code over to the C++ model. And if we > start from scratch, should we continue MUD++ (GPL) or begin anew? > The only thing I would be concerned with, would the basic linux system (redhat 5.x or what ever) still be able to compile the c++???? If it would not, I would not recommend going to it. Other than that, if it is more complicated to understand then I would still recommend not going to it for the newbies again. If the base code is going to be re-written in c++ would there be others out there that would be continuing the efforts on the C code? +------------------------------------------------------------+ | Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: | | http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html | +------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/15/00 PST