On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, William A Romano wrote:
>>Even so, we're seeing *HUGE* numbers of 16k buffers (see below) I've set
>>up 3 as persistent, in hopes of stopping this, but to no avail. Our
>>Syslog is also seeing a lot of activity with freed buffers of this size.
>
>I don't know which version did it, but one of the later versions made the
>buffer list useless.
Does this include the show buffer command being useless? I get spammed out
after 148 16k buffers are listed:
...
5 #146 16384 bytes, Life: 17, Type: Stack, Allocated: unused/0.
5 #147 16384 bytes, Life: 16, Type: Stack, Allocated: unused/0.
5 #148 16384 bytes,
>Have any "forgot to release" messages?
None. And aren't allocating any except what the patch required yet.
>Did you turn on the memory allocating feature?
I tried that, several error messages. I'll look into those this weekend,
anything else I can check?
Thanks!
Ghost
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ensure that you have read the CircleMUD Mailing List FAQ: |
| http://qsilver.queensu.ca/~fletchra/Circle/list-faq.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 04/10/01 PDT